Week Seven

It is week seven of our introduction to Nonprofit & Philanthropy and is one of the most exciting weeks of the term. Week five and six we learned about financials and key roles of board members in an organization, we also had the great pleasure and opportunity to listen to some of the best individuals who currently serve and participate on local nonprofits here in Portland, Oregon. 



After weeks of exploring community needs, class discussions, selecting a community need, and putting together a request for proposal, we finally have the opportunity to hear from them.

Week seven is most exciting because after weeks of substantial research and learning about community needs, we finally get to review proposals and ultimately narrow the number organization who we believe it could benefit the most and maximize the return on our investment. The process requires of heavy critical thinking and attention to details.

While some of the proposals did a great job at providing details others struggle to convey their message and request for money. As we go about reviewing and grading organizations proposal, I find myself reflecting on life while also feeling inspired by those individuals in our community. 

At times, it is often hard not to drop a tear or two while reading some of the proposals. However, it was key to remain focus in order to provided a fair grade based on financial reports (allocation of money), organization attempts to address the issue, and most importantly a solid case for their importance and impact in society. 

During this process, I learned about the many other issues that come up as result of inadequate housing. I also learned that money is not the only way to help others but there is also time, and time is more valuable. Volunteerism is an investment in our community and the people who live in it. 

Thursday class of week seven, we had the opportunity to discuss our chosen organizations. After narrowing down the list, we are ready for week eight where we will have the opportunity to visit some sites. 

Note: The proposals were graded using a rubric system modified and approved by the class members of spring 2017.